Municipal Credit Implications of a Federal Government ShutdownDownload PDF
There have been 14 federal government shutdowns since 1981 with nine lasting more than one business day. While federal employee furloughs and interruptions in federal aid distributions may cause very short-term adjustments for municipal issuers, based on past experience, we believe that a federal government shutdown that lasts beyond a few weeks would have minimal impact on the creditworthiness of municipal bond issuers. While very unlikely, an extended shutdown beyond the 2018-2019 event that lasted 35 days would create further interruption to municipalities, although we feel even that scenario would be manageable, particularly for the high-quality issuers that Appleton invests in.
The following sectors have elevated reliance on federal payments:
- Military, Section 8, and Public Housing – Debt service is typically covered by federal grants or appropriations, which could be interrupted. We do not have exposure to any of these sectors. Most issuers are small, there is single-site risk, and some military debt must be issued on a taxable basis.
- Federal Lease Facilities – Debt service is covered by lease payments made by various federal entities. We do not have exposure to this sector. Ratings are typically low-investment grade and the leases often require extension prior to bond maturity.
- GARVEEs – Appleton does have some exposure to the GARVEE sector although we remain confident in our holdings based on the following factors. Federal Highway Administration distributions continued for GARVEE issuers during past shutdowns, as the funding program is a multi-year authorization act, granted special “Contract Authority” (funding currently authorized through 2026). In addition, some GARVEEs deposit debt service 12 months in advance, others have reserve funds, and some are secured by a backup pledge of revenues by the issuing State, providing additional layers of protection.
- Mass Transit, Higher Ed, Healthcare & Airports – All of these sectors have some level of federal payment reliance. However, revenue diversity, robust liquidity, and budget flexibility would provide ample offsets in the event of a prolonged government shutdown. Notably, Medicaid and Medicare are non-discretionary, and funding is expected to continue to flow during a shutdown.
States and Local Governments would also likely experience a minimal level of interruption during a federal government shutdown. That said, certain regions are more exposed due to a greater number of federal employees, federal contracts, and federal spending on goods and services. For the more exposed credits highlighted below, we believe even a protracted shutdown (>30 days) would still be very manageable.
- District of Columbia – According to BLS data, D.C. is home to more than 191,000 federal employees, 24.7% of the District’s total employment (national median is 1.7%). This level of federal employment reliance has obvious consequences in the event of a shutdown and potential furlough. However, the District has weathered past shutdowns prudently and retains more than $4 billion in available reserves.
- Maryland, Virginia and West Virginia – although less exposed than D.C., these States and local counties still have an above average reliance on the federal government and ancillary businesses to support economic activity. Nonetheless, the region is known for well managed municipalities with many counties and cities enjoying AAA ratings. We are confident in the stability of the regional issuers in which our clients are invested.
- Hawaii and Alaska – Headlines may point to these states as highly exposed to a shutdown due to reliance on federal employees. However, we note that federal employment in Hawaii and Alaska is primarily military focused and Department of Defense payments would likely continue in the event of a shutdown, thereby minimizing the financial impact.
While not specific to municipal credit conditions, it is important to raise implications a potential Moody’s downgrade of U.S. Treasuries could have on Prerefunded bonds. With S&P and Fitch already rating the U.S. one notch below the top tier, a downgrade by Moody’s would likely result in a downgrade of all re-rated Prerefunded bonds backed by U.S. Treasury or Agency collateral. While falling below a “AAA” rating would generate headlines, we believe the municipal market would continue to hold Prerefunded bonds in high regard given the strength of the collateral.
This commentary reflects the opinions of Appleton Partners based on information that we believe to be reliable. It is intended for informational purposes only, and not to suggest any specific performance or results, nor should it be considered investment, financial, tax or other professional advice. It is not an offer or solicitation. Views regarding the economy, securities markets or other specialized areas, like all predictors of future events, cannot be guaranteed to be accurate and may result in economic loss to the investor. While the Adviser believes the outside data sources cited to be credible, it has not independently verified the correctness of any of their inputs or calculations and, therefore, does not warranty the accuracy of any third-party sources or information. Specific securities identified and described may or may not be held in portfolios managed by the Adviser and do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients. The reader should not assume that investments in the securities identified and discussed are, were or will be profitable. Any securities identified were selected for illustrative purposes only, as a vehicle for demonstrating investment analysis and decision making. Investment process, strategies, philosophies, allocations, performance composition, target characteristics and other parameters are current as of the date indicated and are subject to change without prior notice. Registration with the SEC should not be construed as an endorsement or an indicator of investment skill acumen or experience.